The High Court disposed of the writ petition as withdrawn. The petitioner submitted a communication requesting withdrawal, which was accepted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 9367 OF 2013
UMAKANT PANDURANGRAO GHODKE VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Mr. S.R. Kolhare, Advocate for petitioner Mr. P.N. Kutti, AGP for respondent - State
CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH & B.U. DEBADWAR, JJ. DATE : 08-01-2020
ORDER :
1. Learned counsel for petitioner tenders across photocopy
of communication to him dated 03-06-2019 to the effect that petition be withdrawn for the reasons contained in the same.
[ B.U. DEBADWAR ] [ SUNIL P. DESHMUKH ] JUDGE JUDGE
arp/
UMAKANT PANDURANGRAO GHODKE
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
SUNIL P. DESHMUKH
B.U. DEBADWAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
