High Court recalled its earlier order rejecting a mandate for personal approval of teacher appointment after court below found the petitioner was already in service since 1986 with later qualifications leading to a tribunal order for reinstatement.
Review application recalled former order restoring Writ Petition for fresh hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
{1}
ra277-17
drp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
REVEIW APPLICATION NO. 277 OF 2017 IN WRIT PETITION NO.10636 OF 2010
Smt. Prafullata Bhagwanrao Deshmukh APPLICANT
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS
Mr. Swapnil S. Patunkar, Advocate for the applicant Mr. P. N. Kutti, AGP for respondent - State Mr. V. V. Bhavthankar, Advocate for respondent No.2 Mr. S. R. Bagal, Advocate for respondents No. 6 to 8
DATE : 10th JANUARY, 2020
ORDER :
{2}
ra277-17
and had acquired trained teacher’s qualifications in 1999. She had been removed from service at the behest of education officer, however, order of her removal has been set aside by the school tribunal under order dated 10th April, 2002, directing reinstatement of appellant/present petitioner with 75% back wages with consequential benefits.
{3} ra277-17
few factual and legal major and relevant aspects, to recall order dated 10th July, 2012 passed by this court and to restore the writ petition for hearing afresh. Accordingly, order dated 10th July, 2012 stands recalled and the writ petition is restored for hearing afresh.
[B. U. DEBADWAR] [SUNIL P. DESHMUKH] JUDGE JUDGE
drp/ra277-17
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the order falling short of depicting application to major factual and legal aspects warrants recall and restoration for fresh hearing.
Whether appointment of untrained teacher is repugnant to the scheme of Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Act.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Umabai Ramkirshna Deshmukh V/s State of Maharashtra and OthersReferred¶17
“Umabai Ramkirshna Deshmukh V/s State of Maharashtra and Others” dated 4th July, 2019 in writ petition bearing No. 6143 of 2016
Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri Vs. Ganpat Kisan KaraleReferred¶17
“Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri Vs. Ganpat Kisan Karale” dated 3rd March, 2016
State of Jharkhand and Others V/s Jitender Kumar Srivastava and AnotherReferred¶17
“State of Jharkhand and Others V/s Jitender Kumar Srivastava and Another “AIR 2023 SC 3383” · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Prafullata Bhagwanrao Deshmukh
The State of Maharashtra
B. U. DEBADWAR
SUNIL P. DESHMUKH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
