Court disposed of a writ petition seeking 6th Pay Commission benefits by applying consent terms from a referenced Supreme Court decision, directing payment within three months.
Benefits be paid accordingly to the petitioners within three months from the date of judgment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 5559.2012WP..doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.5559 OF 2012
SHIVAJI PANDHARINATH JADHAV AND ORS .. Petitioners
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS ..Respondents
Advocate for Petitioners : Shri S.R. Choukidar AGP for Respondents No.1 & 2 : Shri S.R. Yadav Lonikar Advocate for Respondents No.3 & 4 : Shri S.V. Adwant Respondent No.5 – Served.
Advocate for Respondents No.6 & 7 : Shri V.D. Salunke
CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH & B. U. DEBADWAR, JJ. Date : 07-01-2020
PER COURT :
decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Secretary, Mahatama Gandhi Mission & Anr Vs. Bhartiya Kamgar Sena & Ors , reported in 2017 (1) ALL MR 947 (S.C.) . They further refer to that employees and union in aforesaid decision had
Gajanan
2 5559.2012WP..doc
subsequently settled the matter and had entered into consent terms.
6. Petition is disposed of accordingly.
Gajanan
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present writ petition should be disposed of based on consent terms from the Supreme Court decision in Secretary, Mahatma Gandhi Mission.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Secretary, Mahatma Gandhi Mission & Anr Vs. Bhartiya Kamgar Sena & OrsExplained¶2
2017 (1) ALL MR 947 (S.C.)
Shivaji Pandharinath Jadhav and Ors.
The State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Sunil P. Deshmukh
B. U. Debadwar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
