Allowed

Nitesh Janardan Bharadbhunje v. the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Mubai and or

Bombay HC28 Jan 2020WP/574/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Nagpur disposed of five writ petitions filed seeking remedies against state authorities. The court held that the petitioners have a remedy available under the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal. Consequently, the writ petitions were allowed with liberty to approach the Tribunal, and all questions were left open.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners permitted to withdraw writ petitions with liberty to approach the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal.

Nitesh Janardan Bharadbhunje Vs the State of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2020)

¶1

wp572-575,582.20.odt

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO. 572 OF 2020

¶5

Girish Yashvantrao Kharbikar

¶6

Vs.

¶7

The State of Maharashtra, through its Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai and another

¶8

AND

¶9

WRIT PETITION NO. 573 OF 2020

¶10

Mrs. Anuradha Sanjay Barapatre alias Ku. Domeshwari Wamanrao Kohad Vs. The State of Maharashtra, through its Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai and another

¶11

AND

¶12

WRIT PETITION NO. 574 OF 2020

¶13

Nitesh Janardan Bharadbhujne

¶14

Vs.

¶15

The State of Maharashtra, through its Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai and another

¶16

AND

¶17

WRIT PETITION NO. 575 OF 2020

¶18

Raju Shivshankar Mohadikar

¶19

Vs. The State of Maharashtra, through its Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai and another

¶20

AND

¶21

WRIT PETITION NO. 582 OF 2020

¶22

Wasudeo Dhonduji Nandankar

¶23

Vs.

¶24

The State of Maharashtra, through its Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai and another

¶25

wp572-575,582.20.odt

¶26

¶27

Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions

¶28

Court's or Judge's orders.

¶29

and Registrar's Orders.

¶30

Mr. Anand Deshpande, Advocate for petitioners. Mrs. A.R. Kulkarni, A.G.P. for respondent nos.1 and 2 (W.P. 572/2020). Mr. S.Y. Deopujari, G.P. for respondent nos. 1 and 2 (W.P. 573/2020). Mr. A.S. Fulzele, A.G.P. for respondent nos. 1 and 2 (W.P. 574/2020). Mr. D.P. Thakare, A.G.P. for respondent nos. 1 and 2 (W.P. 575/2020). Mr. N.R. Patil, A.G.P. for respondent nos. 1 and 2 (W.P. 582/2020).

¶31

CORAM : R.K. DESHPANDE AND AMIT B. BORKAR, JJ.

¶32

DATED : JANUARY 28, 2020.

¶33

The petitioners have remedy to approach the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal. Hence, petitioners are permitted to withdraw the writ petitions with liberty to approach the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal. All questions are left open.

¶34

The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly.

¶35

JUDGE

¶36

JUDGE

¶37

srwagh

Nitesh Janardan Bharadbhunje v. the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Mubai and or

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nitesh Janardan Bharadbhunje v. the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Mubai and or

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abdul Rafique Sheikh Munaf Vs State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary,Minority Development Dept. and Others

Omprakash S/O Babulal Baheti and Another Vs Additional Collector and Competent Authority and Others

Priyanka D/O Keshav Chavhan, A.K.A. Priyanka W/O Shrikant Pawar Vs District Caste Scrutiny Committee, Washim and 3 Others

Geeta D/O Mohansing Sengar Vs State of Maharashtra through Director Medical Education and Research and Another

Girish Yashvantrao Kharbikar Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Mubai and or

Raju Shivshankar Mohadikar Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Mubai and or