Writ petition dismissed after petitioner ceased to be interested and later could not secure cognizance despite offering a deposit.
Writ petition dismissed; no relief granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 524 OF 2020
Abdul Rafique Sheikh Munaf
vs.
State of Maharashtra and others
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order
of directions and Registrar's orders
..............................................................................................................................
Ms. Sangeeta Jachak, AGP for respondent nos.1
and 2.
CORAM : R.K. DESHPANDE & AMIT B. BORKAR, JJ. DATED : 27.01.2020.
At the request of learned counsel for the petitioner,
we kept this matter at 2.30 p.m. today, so as to enable him
to make statement. Neither the counsel is present nor any
one has made before us the statement in respect of the
deposit of amount of Rs.5,00,000/-. Since the petitioner is
not interested in going ahead with this matter, Writ Petition
is dismissed.
Later on :
2.Shri Amol Deshpande, learned counsel for the
petitioner, has approached and submits that the petitioner is
personally present before this Court and is prepared to
deposit an amount of Rs.1,00,000/-.
3.We do not find that it is a case where cognizance can
be taken. Writ Petition is dismissed.
JUDGE JUDGE
Ambulkar
Abdul Rafique Sheikh Munaf
State of Maharashtra
R.K. DESHPANDE
AMIT B. BORKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court