The petitioner, a government servant, was directed to approach the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal instead. The writ petition was dismissed with liberty to approach the said Tribunal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp561.20.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION NO. 561 OF 2020
Geeta d/o Mohansing Sengar
Vs.
State of Maharashtra, through Director, Medical Education and Research, Mumbai, J.J. Hospital Mumbai.
Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram,
appearances, Court's orders of directionsCourt's or Judge's orders.
and Registrar's Orders.
Mr. M.V. Bute, Advocate for petitioners
Mr. A.S. Fulzele, A.G.P. for respondent nos.1 and 2.
CORAM : R.K. DESHPANDE AND AMIT B. BORKAR, JJ.
DATED : JANUARY 28, 2020.
The petitioner is a Government servant
and he has remedy to approach the Maharashtra
Administrative Tribunal for the reliefs claimed in this
writ petition. Hence, petitioner is permitted to
withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach
the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal.
The writ petition is disposed of
accordingly. All questions are left open.
JUDGE JUDGE
srwagh
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Geeta d/o Mohansing Sengar
State of Maharashtra through Director, Medical Education and Research, Mumbai, J.J. Hospital Mumbai
R.K. Deshpande
Amit B. Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court