Petitioner counsel stated the writ petition is infructuous with the passage of time. The High Court disposed of the petition accordingly without substantive adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
937-WP-5703-09.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.5703 OF 2009
KU. MADHURI D/O. NARENDRA SAINDANE (KOLI) VERSUS
MAHARASHTRA STATE EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH AND TRAINING INSTITUTE
Advocate for Petitioners : Shri Kalyan Patil h/f Shri S.R. Barlinge AGP for Respondent : Shri G. O. Wattamwar
CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH AND B. U. DEBADWAR, JJ.
DATE : 03rd JANUARY, 2020
PER COURT :
(B. U. DEBADWAR, J.)
(SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.)
SVH
1 of 1
KU. Madhuri D/O. Narendra Saindane (Koli)
Maharashtra State Educational Research and Training Institute
Sunil P. Deshmukh
B. U. Debadarwar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
