In this family court appeal, the court allowed the appellant's application for alternate modes of service of summons. It ordered publication of notices in newspapers and service by email. The court also continued existing interim relief.
Alternate service by newspaper publication and email ordered; existing interim relief continued.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
925-FCA-74-19.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.74 OF 2019 WITH CA/12668/2019 IN FCA/74/2019 WITH CA/13669/2019 IN FCA/74/2019 WITH CA/13672/2019 IN FCA/74/2019 WITH CA/13671/2019 IN FCA/74/2019
KARTHIK SHANKARAPPA NAIK VERSUS
NEHA KARTHIK NAIK AND ANR
Advocate for Appellant : Smt. Jai Vaidya h/f Shri Abid R. Shaikh
CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH & B. U. DEBADWAR, JJ. DATE : 03rd JANUARY, 2020
PER COURT :
No.2 is highly educated and qualified and earlier had served at a multinational company and her brother is settled in U.S.A. and there is every possibility that she may leave India in order to avoid further legal proceedings.
1
925-FCA-74-19.odt
longer residing on the given address.
(B. U. DEBADWAR, J.) (SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.)
SVH
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appellant is entitled to serve respondents through alternate modes of service such as publication in newspapers or email due to inability to serve personally.
Karthik Shankarappa Naik
Neha Kartik Naik
Sunil P. Deshmukh
B. U. Dabadwar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
