This order allows alternate modes of service and continues interim relief in a family appeal where notice could not be served on respondents at their registered address.
Allowed alternate service modes and continued interim relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
925-FCA-74-19.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.74 OF 2019 WITH CA/12668/2019 IN FCA/74/2019 WITH CA/13669/2019 IN FCA/74/2019 WITH CA/13672/2019 IN FCA/74/2019 WITH CA/13671/2019 IN FCA/74/2019
KARTHIK SHANKARAPPA NAIK VERSUS
NEHA KARTHIK NAIK AND ANR
Advocate for Appellant : Smt. Jai Vaidya h/f Shri Abid R. Shaikh
CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH & B. U. DEBADWAR, JJ. DATE : 03rd JANUARY, 2020
PER COURT :
No.2 is highly educated and qualified and earlier had served at a multinational company and her brother is settled in U.S.A. and there is every possibility that she may leave India in order to avoid further legal proceedings.
1
925-FCA-74-19.odt
longer residing on the given address.
(B. U. DEBADWAR, J.) (SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.)
SVH
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether appellant is entitled to serve notice on respondents through alternate modes such as e-mail, affixation, and publication given failure to serve at the registered address.
KARTHIK SHANKARAPPA NAIK
NEHA KARTHIK NAIK
SUNIL P. DESHMUKH
B. U. DEBADWAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
