Disposed

Sau. Bebitai Siddharth Tayde and Others v. Honble Minister, Rural Development Dept., Mumbai and Others

Bombay HC4 Jan 2020WP/546/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of a writ petition challenging election notices issued during the pendency of an appeal against removal from Panchayat posts, observing subsequent elections remain subject to the appeal's outcome.

What did the court decide?

Disposal of the Writ Petition with observation that elections are subject to the outcome of the petitioners' appeal.

Sau. Bebitai Siddharth Tayde and Others Vs… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2020)

¶1

1 44.WP546.19.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO.546/2019

¶4

Sau. Bebitai Siddharth Tayde and others

¶5

Vs.

¶6

 Hon’ble Minister, Rural Development Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai and others.

¶7

…........................................................................................................................................
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order
of directions and Registrar's orders

¶8

........................................................................................................................................…...
Shri. N. R. Patil, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent
Nos.1 to 3.

¶9

CORAM : R.K. DESHPANDE &

¶10

A.S. CHANDURKAR, JJ. DATED : 04^th JANUARY, 2020.

¶11

.None for the petitioner.

¶12

The relief sought in the Writ Petition is for
setting side the notices dated 10.01.2019 and
14.01.2019 that were issued by the Collector for
holding election to fill in the vacancies on the post of
Sarpanch and Upsarpanch by the Gram Panchayat. The
Petitioner and certain other members of the Gram
Panchayat were removed from their posts under Section
39(1) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act 1958.
The said members including the petitioners then filed
an appeal before the State Government. During
pendency of that appeal, the impugned notices have
been issued for filling in the vacancies.

¶13

This Court while issuing notice on
22.01.2019 did not grant any interim relief in favour of
the petitioners. It is therefore, likely that the elections

¶14

2 44.WP546.19.odt

¶15

that were scheduled on 24.01.2019 might have been
held.

¶16

Accordingly, we dispose of the Writ Petition
by observing that the subsequent elections held would
be subject to the outcome of the appeal filed by the
petitioners and other members before the State
Government.

¶17

JUDGEJUDGE

¶18

RGurnule

Sau. Bebitai Siddharth Tayde and Others v. Honble Minister, Rural Development Dept., Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sau. Bebitai Siddharth Tayde and Others v. Honble Minister, Rural Development Dept., Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ku. Shraddha D/O Suresh Sonwane Vs State of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary, Tribal Development Dept., Mumbai and Others

Ku. Kajal D/O Shrawanji Katoke Vs the Divisional Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee NO.3, Nagpurf Thr. Member Secretary and Others

Pandurang Atmaramji Mane Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Principal Secretary Dept. of Higher and Technical Edu. Mumbai and Others

Sonal Rajesh Barbate Vs State of Maharashtra, through the Secretary Dept. of Higher and Technical Education, Mumbai and Ors.

Ajay S/O Mahadeorao Donge Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary, Tribal Welfare Dept., Mumbai and Others

Digambar S/O Mahadeorao Donge Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary, Tribal Welfare Dept., Mumbai and Others