Disposed

Digambar S/O Mahadeorao Donge v. the State of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary, Tribal Welfare Dept., Mumbai and Others

Bombay HC4 Jan 2020WP/180/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court directed the Scrutiny Committee to decide the petitioner's caste claim within six months from 20.01.2020 upon his cooperation, and continued an interim order protecting his service during adjudication.

What did the court decide?

The Scrutiny Committee shall decide the caste claim within six months from 20.01.2020; interim order protecting service continued.

Digambar S/O Mahadeorao Donge Vs the State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2020)

¶1

1 15.WP180.19.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO.180/2019

¶4

Digambar Mahadeorao Donge Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others.

¶5

…........................................................................................................................................
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order
of directions and Registrar's orders

¶6

........................................................................................................................................…...
Shri G. G. Mishra, Advocate for the petitioner.
Shri T. H. Thakare, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent
Nos.1 to 4.

¶7

CORAM : R.K. DESHPANDE &

¶8

A.S. CHANDURKAR, JJ.
DATED: 04th JANUARY, 2020.

¶9

.The only relief sought by the petitioner is a
direction that the caste claim made by him before the
Scrutiny Committee in the year 2013 be directed to be
decided within a stipulated period.

¶10

2.Shri Thakare, the learned Assistant
Government Pleader submits that if the petitioner
co-operates with the Scrutiny Committee, the caste
claim would be decided within a period of six months.
In that view of the matter, the following order is passed.

¶11

(i)The petitioner shall appear before the
Scrutiny Committee on 20.01.2020.
Subject to his co-operating with the
Scrutiny Committee and prosecuting the
matter diligently, the Scrutiny Committee
shall decide the caste claim within a period
of six months from that date.

¶12

2 15.WP180.19.odt

¶13

(ii)The interim order protecting the
service of the petitioner shall continue to
operate till the aforesaid adjudication is
completed.

¶14

(iii)The Writ Petition is disposed of with
aforesaid directions. No costs.

¶15

JUDGE JUDGE

¶16

RGurnule

Digambar S/O Mahadeorao Donge v. the State of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary, Tribal Welfare Dept., Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Digambar S/O Mahadeorao Donge v. the State of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary, Tribal Welfare Dept., Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ku. Shraddha D/O Suresh Sonwane Vs State of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary, Tribal Development Dept., Mumbai and Others

Ku. Kajal D/O Shrawanji Katoke Vs the Divisional Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee NO.3, Nagpurf Thr. Member Secretary and Others

Pandurang Atmaramji Mane Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Principal Secretary Dept. of Higher and Technical Edu. Mumbai and Others

Sau. Bebitai Siddharth Tayde and Others Vs Honble Minister, Rural Development Dept., Mumbai and Others

Sonal Rajesh Barbate Vs State of Maharashtra, through the Secretary Dept. of Higher and Technical Education, Mumbai and Ors.

Ajay S/O Mahadeorao Donge Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary, Tribal Welfare Dept., Mumbai and Others