Dismissed

Sonal Rajesh Barbate v. State of Maharashtra, through the Secretary Dept. of Higher and Technical Education, Mumbai and Ors.

Bombay HC4 Jan 2020WP/534/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought direction for a Scrutiny Committee to decide her caste claim belonging to Kirad Nomadic Tribe. The Respondent submitted that a Validity Certificate was already issued, redressing the grievance, and the petition was disposed. The reservation in college was confirmed.

What did the court decide?

Writ Petition dismissed; petitioner entitled to education in reserved seat for Kirad Nomadic Tribes.

Sonal Rajesh Barbate Vs State of Maharashtra… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2020)

¶1

1 43.WP534.19.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO.534/2019

¶4

Sonal Rajesh Barbate Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others.

¶5

…........................................................................................................................................
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order
of directions and Registrar's orders

¶6

........................................................................................................................................…...
Shri R. R. Chougule h/f Shri S.D.Harode, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. A. R. Kulkarni, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent
Nos.1 & 4.

¶7

Shri P. R. Puri, Advocate for respondent No.3.

¶8

CORAM : R.K. DESHPANDE & A.S. CHANDURKAR, JJ. DATED : 04^th JANUARY, 2020.

¶9

.The petitioner has filed the present Writ
Petition praying that the Scrutiny Committee be
directed to decide her caste claim. The petitioner is
pursuing her college education and she claimed that she
belongs to “Kirad” Nomadic Tribe (B).

¶10

2.It is submitted by the learned Assistant
Government Pleader on instructions that on
18.09.2019, the Scrutiny Committee has issued Validity
Certificate to the petitioner. In that view of the matter,
the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed.
Needless to state that the petitioner is entitled to
continue her education as being admitted in the seat
reserved for “Kirad” Nomadic Tribes (B).

¶11

3.The Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶12

JUDGEJUDGE

¶13

RGurnule

Sonal Rajesh Barbate v. State of Maharashtra, through the Secretary Dept. of Higher and Technical Education, Mumbai and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sonal Rajesh Barbate v. State of Maharashtra, through the Secretary Dept. of Higher and Technical Education, Mumbai and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ku. Shraddha D/O Suresh Sonwane Vs State of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary, Tribal Development Dept., Mumbai and Others

Ku. Kajal D/O Shrawanji Katoke Vs the Divisional Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee NO.3, Nagpurf Thr. Member Secretary and Others

Pandurang Atmaramji Mane Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Principal Secretary Dept. of Higher and Technical Edu. Mumbai and Others

Sau. Bebitai Siddharth Tayde and Others Vs Honble Minister, Rural Development Dept., Mumbai and Others

Ajay S/O Mahadeorao Donge Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary, Tribal Welfare Dept., Mumbai and Others

Digambar S/O Mahadeorao Donge Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary, Tribal Welfare Dept., Mumbai and Others