Disposed

M/S. Dewoo Shine Restaurant through Prop. Shri. Gajanan Sakharam Tidke v. the State of Maharashtra, State Excise, Maharashtra State, Mumbai Thr. Secretary and Others

Bombay HC6 Jan 2020WP/4968/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Two writ petitions filed by restaurant proprietors seeking a decision on pending applications for FL-III liquor licenses. The court, noting police reports were awaited, directed the Excise authorities to consider and decide the applications within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directed respondent Nos. 2 and 3 to consider the applications for issuance of FL-III License and take a decision within six weeks.

M/S. Dewoo Shine Restaurant through Prop. Shri… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2020)

¶1

1 WP. 4966-19 & WP. 4968-19.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO. 4966 OF 2019

¶4

( M/s. Aditya Restaurant, Thr. Its Proprietor – Smt. Sarala Santosh Singh
Vs.

¶5

The State of Maharashtra, State Excise, Maharashtra State, Mantralaya,
Mumbai, Thr. Its Secretary & Ors. )

¶6

WITH

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO. 4968 OF 2019

¶8

( M/s. Dewoo Shine Restaurant, Thr. Its Proprietor – Shri Gajanan Sakharam
Tidke

¶9

Vs.

¶10

The State of Maharashtra, State Excise, Maharashtra State, Mantralaya,
Mumbai, Thr. Its Secretary & Ors. )

¶11

- - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - -- - -- - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

¶12

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders
appearances, Court's orders of directions
and Registrar's orders

¶13

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - -- - -- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- -- - - - - - - - - - - -

¶14

Shri S.G. Jagtap, Advocate for the Petitioner
Mrs. A.R. Kulkarni, AGP for Respondents

¶15

CORAM: R.K. DESHPANDE & A.S. CHANDURKAR, JJ.

¶16

DATED : 06th January, 2020.

¶17

In both these writ petitions, the petitioners
pray that the applications moved by them issuance of
FL-III License that are pending with the Authorities but
have not been considered till date be directed to be
decided.

¶18

2.Pursuant to notice issued in the writ
petitions, it is submitted by the learned AGP that
necessary reports from the Police Department are still

¶19

2 WP. 4966-19 & WP. 4968-19.odt

¶20

awaited.

¶21

3. Considering the limited relief sought, both
the writ petitions are disposed of by directing the
respondent Nos. 2 and 3 to consider the applications
moved by the petitioners for issuance of FL-III License.
Necessary decision be taken within a period of six
weeks from today.

¶22

4.No costs.

¶23

JUDGE JUDGE

¶24

SD. Bhimte

M/S. Dewoo Shine Restaurant through Prop. Shri. Gajanan Sakharam Tidke v. the State of Maharashtra, State Excise, Maharashtra State, Mumbai Thr. Secretary and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S. Dewoo Shine Restaurant through Prop. Shri. Gajanan Sakharam Tidke v. the State of Maharashtra, State Excise, Maharashtra State, Mumbai Thr. Secretary and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Digambar S/O Mahadeorao Donge Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary, Tribal Welfare Dept., Mumbai and Others

Ajay S/O Mahadeorao Donge Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary, Tribal Welfare Dept., Mumbai and Others

Sonal Rajesh Barbate Vs State of Maharashtra, through the Secretary Dept. of Higher and Technical Education, Mumbai and Ors.

Ramesh Laxman Sargar Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Urban Development Department, Mumbai and Others

Sadashiv Sattidin Gupta Vs the Chirman, Managing Director Western Coalfields Ltd. Nagpur and Others

Samba S/O Vithu Kapate Vs Western Coal Fields Ltd., through Its General Manager, Chandrapur and 5