Leave is granted to withdraw the writ petition, and the same is disposed of accordingly. The judgment contains no substantive legal proposition.
Withdrawal of the writ petition allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.3774 OF 2014
DR. BABURAO SUNDARRAO SALUNKE
..Petitioner
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ..Respondents
Advocate for Petitioner : Shri D.J. Choudhary AGP for Respondents No.1 to 3 : Shri A.V. Deshmukh Advocate for Respondent No.4 : Shri L.S. Shaikh Respondent No.5 – Served.
CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH & B. U. DEBADWAR, JJ.
Date : 15-01-2020
PER COURT :
( B. U. DEBADWAR, J. ) ( SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J. )
Gajanan
Dr. Baburaao Sundarrao Salunke
The State of Maharashtra
Sunil P. Deshmukh
B. U. Debadwar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
