Dismissed

Rama Vithal Sapkale and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC14 Jan 2020WP/2896/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court directed the Scheduled Tribe Certificates Scrutiny Committee to decide pending tribe claims of petitioners within six months and continued interim relief not to take adverse action regarding validation certificates until the committee decides.

What did the court decide?

Direction to scrutiny committee to decide pending tribe claims within six months and continuation of interim relief against adverse action.

Rama Vithal Sapkale and Others Vs the State… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2020)

¶1

wp2896.13

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO.2896 OF 2013

¶5

1. Rama s/o Vithal Sapkale,

¶6

1. Pralhad s/o Uttam Sapkale,

¶7

1. Pandharinath s/o Pundlik Thokare,

¶8

1. Prakash s/o Gangaram Nanware,

¶9

1. Motilal s/o Bhagwat Sapkale,

¶10

1. Samadhan s/o Mansaram Sonawane ...PETITIONERS

¶11

VERSUS

¶12

1. The State of Maharashtra, Through its Secretary, Tribal Development Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32,

¶13

1. The Scheduled Tribe Certificates Scrutiny & Verification Committee, Nandurbar Region, Nandurbar,

¶14

1. The Divisional Controller, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, Jalgaon Division, Jalgaon.

¶15

...RESPONDENTS

¶16

... Mr.S.R. Barlinge Advocate for Petitioners. Mr.P.N. Kutti, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr.M.K. Goyanka Advocate for Respondent No.3.

¶17

wp2896.13

¶18

¶19

CORAM: SUNIL P. DESHMUKH AND B.U. DEBADWAR, JJ.

¶20

DATE : 14TH JANUARY, 2020

¶21

ORDER :

¶22

Heard learned counsel for appearing parties. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that tribe claims of the petitioners are pending before scrutiny committee and yet have not been decided.

¶23

In the circumstances, we deem it expedient to direct the scrutiny committee to decide on pending tribe claims of the petitioners as early as possible, preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of writ of this order. The petitioners to co-operate with the scrutiny committee in early disposal of their tribe claims.

¶24

Learned counsel for petitioners also points out that interim relief, not to take adverse action against the petitioners on the ground of their failure to submit validation certificates, is operating.

¶25

In view of the same, said interim relief to continue to

wp2896.13

operate till the decision by the scrutiny committee.

¶30

The petition, with the aforesaid observations, stands

¶31

disposed of.

¶32

(B.U. DEBADWAR, J.) [SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.]

¶33

asb/JAN20

Rama Vithal Sapkale and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rama Vithal Sapkale and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Najiullaha Khan Fatahulla Khan Vs the State of Mah and Ors.

Pepsico India Holdings Pvt. Ltd. Thr. Nilesh Kumar Chaudhary Vs Midc, Thr. Ceo, and Ors.

Ramkishan Khemaji Deshmukhe Vs Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. through Its Managing Director and Another

Amar Harichandra Bhoinwad Vs Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Aurangabad and Another

Raju Pundlik Baviskar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Suresh Laxmanrao Perke Vs the State of Mah and Ors.