Disposed

Raju Pundlik Baviskar v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC14 Jan 2020WP/3390/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition concerned the direction to complete scrutiny of a tribal claim. The court directed the scrutiny committee to decide the pending claim within six months and continued interim relief protecting the petitioner from adverse action.

What did the court decide?

Order directing scrutiny committee to decide pending tribe claim within six months and continue interim relief.

Raju Pundlik Baviskar Vs the State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2020)

¶1

wp3390.13

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶4

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO.3390 OF 2013

¶6

Shri Raju s/o Pundlik Baviskar, Age-43 years, Occu:Service as a Driver with Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation Ltd., Jalgaon, R/o-Tambepura, Ganesh Colony, Amalner, Tq-Amalner, Dist-Jalgaon.

¶7

...PETITIONER

¶8

VERSUS

¶9

1. The State of Maharashtra, Department of Tribal Development, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32, Through its Secretary,

¶10

1. The Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nandurbar Division, Nandurbar, Through its Secretary,

¶11

1. The Divisional Controller, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, Jalgaon Division, Jalgaon.

¶12

...RESPONDENTS

¶13

Mr.A.S. Golegaonkar Advocate for Petitioner. Mr.S.N. Kendre, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.

¶14

Mr.M.K. Goyanka Advocate for Respondent No.3.

¶15

wp3390.13

¶16

¶17

CORAM: SUNIL P. DESHMUKH AND B.U. DEBADWAR, JJ.

¶18

DATE : 14TH JANUARY, 2020

¶19

ORDER :

¶20

Heard learned counsel for appearing parties. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that tribe claim of the petitioner is pending before scrutiny committee for scrutiny and yet has not been decided.

¶21

In the circumstances, we deem it expedient to direct the scrutiny committee to decide on pending tribe claim of the petitioner as early as possible, preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of writ of this order. The petitioner to co-operate with the scrutiny committee in early disposal of his tribe claim.

¶22

Learned counsel for petitioner also points out that interim relief, not to take adverse action against the petitioner on accont of his failure to submit caste validation certificate, is operating.

¶23

In view of the same, said interim relief to continue to

¶24

wp3390.13

¶25

¶26

operate till the decision by the scrutiny committee.

¶27

The petition, with the aforesaid observations, stands

¶28

disposed of.

¶29

(B.U. DEBADWAR, J.) [SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.]

¶30

asb/JAN20

Raju Pundlik Baviskar v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raju Pundlik Baviskar v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Najiullaha Khan Fatahulla Khan Vs the State of Mah and Ors.

Pepsico India Holdings Pvt. Ltd. Thr. Nilesh Kumar Chaudhary Vs Midc, Thr. Ceo, and Ors.

Ramkishan Khemaji Deshmukhe Vs Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. through Its Managing Director and Another

Rama Vithal Sapkale and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Amar Harichandra Bhoinwad Vs Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Aurangabad and Another

Suresh Laxmanrao Perke Vs the State of Mah and Ors.