Petitioner sought leave to withdraw the criminal writ petition. The Court granted leave and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Leave granted to withdraw the petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 Cri.W.P.No.196.2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 196 OF 2020
Naseem Ahmed Habib Ahmed,
..VS..
State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, Home Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai and
Ors.,
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders
appearances, Court's orders of directions
and Registrar's orders
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shri Raju Kadu, Advocate for the petitioner.
Shri A. A. Madiwale, A.P.P. for the respondents.
CORAM : SUNIL B. SHUKRE AND AVINASH G. GHAROTE, JJ.
DATED: 11th December, 2020
Learned Counsel for the petitioner, on
instructions, seeks leave of the Court to withdraw the
petition. Keeping all questions open, leave is granted as
prayed for.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
JUDGE
JUDGE
Kirtak
Naseem Ahmed Habib Ahmed
State of Maharashtra
Sunil B. Shukre
Avinash G. Gharote
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court