Disposed

Organization for the Rights of Tribal, Nagpur through President Shri. Rajendra S/O Dadaji Maraskolh v. State of Maharashtra, through Chief Secretary, Mumbai and Others

Bombay HC9 Dec 2020CAW/327/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Court disposed of two Civil Applications by rejecting one and directing filing of a missing application, adjourned a Writ Petition for later hearing, and kept open questions relating to applicants.

What did the court decide?

CAW 327/2020 rejected; CAW 277/2019 for next date; WP 3140/2018 adjourned to January 2021.

What the court decided

Organization for the Rights of Tribal, Nagpur… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2020)

¶1

CAW 277.2019, 327.2020..odt

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR

¶4

Civil Application (CAW) No. 327/2020 WITH Civil Application (CAW) No. 277/2019 IN

¶5

Writ Petition No. 3140/2018 Organization for Right of Tribal

¶6

..VS..

¶7

State of Maharashtra and ors.

¶8

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order
Coram, appearances, Court's Orders
or directions and Registrar's orderShri S.P. Bhandarkar, Advocate for the petitioner __________________________________________________________

¶9

Shri S.Y. Deopujari, GP for respondent nos. 1 to 12 and 14 to 17
Shri S.R. Narnaware, Advocate for intervenor no. 1 to 3
Shri Vakas Kulsange, Advocate for intervenor no. 4
Shri S.D. Borkar, Advocate for intervenor in CAW No. 327/2020
Shri P.V. Vaidya, Advocate for intervenor in CAW No.277/2019

¶10

CORAM : SUNIL B. SHUKRE AND AVINASH G. GHAROTE, JJ.

¶11

DATED:09/12/2020

¶12

Heard.

¶13

Consider the contention of the applicants that they
are affected by Government Resolution dated 21.12.2019,
the validity of which is under consideration in several
matters which are now pending before the High Court of
Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, Aurangabad,
and that issue presently not involved in this petition. This
application cannot be allowed and it stands rejected,
however, all questions as would relate to or affect the
applicants are kept open.

¶14

CAW 277.2019, 327.2020..odt

¶15

¶16

Accordingly, Civil Application (CAW) No.
327/2020, is disposed of.

¶17

Civil Application (CAW) No. 277/2019

¶18

Heard.

¶19

Another set of Civil Application (CAW) No.
277/2019 is not available on record. The applicant may
file the same before next date.

¶20

Writ Petition No. 3140/2018

¶21

Stand over in the third week of January, 2021.

¶22

JUDGEJUDGE

¶23

SMGate

Organization for the Rights of Tribal, Nagpur through President Shri. Rajendra S/O Dadaji Maraskolh v. State of Maharashtra, through Chief Secretary, Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Organization for the Rights of Tribal, Nagpur through President Shri. Rajendra S/O Dadaji Maraskolh v. State of Maharashtra, through Chief Secretary, Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Omkar Deepak Bhujade Vs State of Maharashtra Thr. Secretary Dept. of Home Mantralaya Mumbai and Others

Rahul S/o Harishchandra Mhaiskar Vs State of Maharashtra Thr. Its Secretary, Department of Home Mantralaya, MUMBAI-32. and 2 Others

Roshan Harishchandra Mhaiskar Thr His Mother Ashabai Harishchandra Mhaiskar Vs State of Maharashtra Thr. Its Secretary, Department of Home, Mantralaya, Mumbai and 2 Others

Vijay Gajanan Mangle Vs Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Akot, Akola and Another

Atik Ahmed Sheikh Nazir (in Jail) Vs State of Maharashtra Thr. the Deputy Inspector General of Prison, Nagpur Er Nagpur and Another

Samuel Joseph Beera (in Jail) Vs State of Maharashtra Thr. Secretary Home Dept. Mantralaya Mumbai and Others