Order in Public Interest Litigation requiring the petitioner to deposit Rupees One Lakh as security to test bona fides per Rule 7A of Bombay High Court PIL Rules, failing which the PIL shall be dismissed.
Direction to petitioner to deposit Rs. 1,00,000 within two weeks to proceed; non-compliance leads to dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 923-PIL 67-2020.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 67 OF 2020
Vijay Manikrao Bhamble
.. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others
.. Respondents
Mr. V. D. Salunke, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. A. R. Kale, AGP for Respondents-State.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ.
DATED : 09th DECEMBER, 2020.
PER COURT:-
.The present litigation is filed as a Public Interest Litigation. The
petitioner has no direct interest in the subject matter. To test the
bonafides of the petitioner and by way of security in the event writ
petition is dismissed, so also as per the Rule 7A of the Bombay High
Court Public Interest Litigation Rules, the petitioner shall deposit an
amount of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) within a period of
two (02) weeks from today.
[
2.If the amount as directed by this Court is deposited by the
petitioner, then the matter be listed. If the amount as directed by this
Court is not deposited by the petitioner, the public interest litigation
shall stand dismissed without reference to the Court.
( SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI )( S. V. GANGAPURWALA )
JUDGE JUDGE
P.S.B.
1 of 1
Vijay Manikroo Bhamble
The State of Maharashtra and others
S. V. Gangapurwala
Shrikant D. Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court