The High Court at Aurangabad permitted a petitioner to terminate her pregnancy following a positive recommendation from a Medical Expert Committee which ruled her medically fit for the procedure.
Permission granted to the petitioner to terminate her pregnancy at a government-recognized center.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
W.P.8071-2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 8071 OF 2020
Sapna Namdev Khandare
..Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and ors.
..Respondents
Mr Ravindra Nirmal, Advocate for petitioner Mr A.R. Kale, A.G.P. for respondents
CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ.
DATE : 10th December 2020
PER COURT :
the Expert Committee and the Expert Committee submitted the report.
| Sr. No. | Investigations done | |
|---|---|---|
| 01. | CBC, URINE ROUTINE | Blood group – A Negative, Hb-7 gm%, Urine routine - WNL |
| 02. | USG | Single live intrauterine gestation with average gestational age 21 weeks 6 days with fetal hypoplastic left ventricle & small diameter of ascending arota. Left kedney not visualized ?? Agenis ?? Ectopic |
2
W.P.8071-2020
vvr
1 issue framed by the court
Whether permission should be granted to the petitioner to undergo medical termination of pregnancy.
Sapna Namdev Khandare
The State of Maharashtra
S.V. Gangapurwala
Shrikant D. Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
