Dismissed
Balasaheb Rauba Jadhav v. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Bombay HCPIL/1/2020
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 9-PIL-1-2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.1 OF 2020
BALASAHEB RAUBA JADHAV
...PETITIONER
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
...RESPONDENTS
Mr A.R. Devakate, Advocate for Petitioner Mr S.B. Yawalkar, AGP for Respondent-State
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE AND ANIL S. KILOR, JJ.
DATE : 6th JANUARY, 2020
PER COURT :
[ ANIL S. KILOR ] [ PRASANNA B. VARALE ] JUDGE JUDGE
mta
BALASAHEB RAUBA JADHAV
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
PRASANNA B. VARALE
ANIL S. KILOR
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court