This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
4.PIL-58-09.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.58 OF 2009
Shri Pratap Sarnaik … Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. … Respondents
Mr.Sagar Joshi for the Petitioner absent.
Mr.P.P.Kakade-Government Pleader a/w Mr.B.V.Samant-AGP for Respondent No.1 (State).
Mr.Prashant Chavan a/w Ms.Reshmarani Nathani i/b Mr.Nitin Dhumal for Respondent No.2.
Mr.Sharan Jagtiani a/w Rishir Daulat, Teresa Daulat and Priyanka Gidh i/b M/S Divya Shah Associates for Respondent No.3.
CORAM :- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & R.I.CHAGLA, JJ.
DATE :- JANUARY 02, 2020
P.C. :-
The collection only at a particular point is questioned.
Page 1 of 2
M.M.Salgaonkar
4.PIL-58-09.doc
(R.I.CHAGLA, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Page 2 of 2
M.M.Salgaonkar
Shri Pratap Sarnaik
The State of Maharashtra
S. C. DHARMADHIKARI
R.I.CHAGLA
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
