The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of PIL No. 106 of 2019, allowing withdrawal of the petition with liberty to file a fresh comprehensive PIL.
Public interest litigation allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file proper and comprehensive public interest litigation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
106.19pil
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.106 OF 2019
Sachin s/o Bhimrao Chavan, Age: 36 years, Occu: Agri., R/o. Bodhighat, Ambajogai, Tal. Ambajogai, Dist. Beed
..PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra, Through its Principal Secretary, Co-operation, Marketing and Textile Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai & ors.
..RESPONDENTS
Mr S. S. Thombre, Advocate for petitioner; Mr S. B. Yawalkar, A.G.P. for respondents/State
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE AND ANIL S. KILOR, JJ. DATE : 13th January, 2020
ORAL ORDER:
After arguing for some time, Mr Thombre, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner be permitted to withdraw the present public interest litigation with liberty to file proper and comprehensive public interest litigation.
(ANIL S. KILOR, J.)
(PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.)
sjk
Sachin s/o Bhimrao Chavan
The State of Maharashtra
Prashanna B. Varale
Anil S. Kilor
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
