The Division Bench order restoring the petition was set aside because the applicant withdrew the writ petition unconditionally. The court disposed of the matter on the will and risk of the petitioner without deciding on merits.
Civil application disposed of; Writ Petition disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
C.A.9245/2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.9245 OF 2019
IN WRIT PETITION NO. 595 OF 2007 WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.595 OF 2007
Sanjay s/o Madanlal Kabra
.. Applicants
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and anr.
.. Respondents
Mr A.S. Londhe, Advocate for applicants Mr S.S. Dande, A.G.P. for respondents
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE AND ANIL S. KILOR, JJ.
DATE : 10.01.2020
ORAL ORDER :
2
C.A.9245/2019
( ANIL S. KILOR, J.)
( PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.)
vvr
Sanjay s/o Madanlal Kabra
The State of Maharashtra
Prasantra B. Varale
Anil S. Kilor
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
