A single-paragraph order where the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad allowed Civil Application No. 101 of 2020 based on reasons contained in the petition and disposed of the matter following prayer clause (B).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
101.20CA
vdk
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 101 OF 2020 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 408 OF 2018
Satyabhamabai W/O Saudagar Shinde (Died) Through her L.Rs.
Saudagar s/o Satappa Shinde and others
…..Applicant
VERSUS
Narshing s/o Arjun Kawale (Died) Through L. Rs. Rukmaji Narshing Kawale (Died) Through L. Rs. Tulsabai w/o Rukmaji Kawale and others ..... Respondents
Mr. Jeevan R. Patil, Advocate for Mr. D. N. Gilche, Advocate for the applicants
Mr. G. K. Sontakke, Advocate for respondents no. 1 to 5 Mr. S. N. Kendre, Assistant Government Pleader for respondents/State
DATE : 16th January, 2020
ORDER :
allowed in terms of prayer clause (B) and is disposed of.
[B. U. DEBADWAR] [SUNIL P. DESHMUKH] JUDGE JUDGE vdk/101.20CA
Satyabhamabai W/O Saudagar Shinde (Died) Through her L.Rs. Saudagar s/o Satappa Shinde and others
Narshing s/o Arjun Kawale (Died) Through L. Rs. Rukmaji Narshing Kawale (Died) Through L. Rs. Tulsabai w/o Rukmaji Kawale and others
B. U. DEBADWAR
SUNIL P. DESHMUKH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
