Disposed
Vijeshkumar T. Agarwal v. State of Maharashtra through the Pricipal Secretary and Anr.
Bombay HCWP/989/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
rsk
14-WP-989-18.doc
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.989 OF 2018
Vijeshkumar T. Agarwal
...Petitioner
vs.
The State of Maharashtra and Anr.
...Respondents
Mr. Sheroo Kanuga for the Petitioner. Ms. K. N. Solunke, AGP for the Respondent/State.
CORAM : B. P. DHARMADHIKARI & SANDEEP KASHINATH SHINDE, JJ. DATE : 26/08/2019.
P.C.:
. Respondent No.2 Gram Panchayat which has carried out alleged illegal assessment is from Ahmednagar District. Cause of action therefore has arisen in territorial jurisdiction of Aurangabad Bench of this High Court.
(SANDEEP KASHINATH SHINDE, J.) (B. P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Vijeshkumar T. Agarwal
The State of Maharashtra
Sandeep Kashinath Shinde
B. P. Dharmadikari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court