Writ petition seeking mandamus for action against excessive construction by respondent was disposed of as matter came up long after delay without court's intervention being warranted.
Petition dismissed with liberty to take other legal steps open in law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
rsk
16-WP-3493-18.doc
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.3493 OF 2018
Prathamesh Shrikrishna Prabhulendolkar vs.
Gram Panchayat Parnali and Ors.
...Petitioner
...Respondents
Ms. Tanvi Kamat for the Petitioner. Mr. P. G. Sawant, AGP for the Respondent/State
CORAM : B. P. DHARMADHIKARI & SANDEEP KASHINATH SHINDE, JJ.
DATE : 26/08/2019.
P.C.:
. Heard. Learned counsel after making representations in April 2016 pointed out that respondent Nos. 6 and 7 have raised excessive construction i.e. structures up to 4th , 5th floor, the present petition has been filed in March 2018 seeking mandamus for initiation of necessary action from completion of notice action.
(SANDEEP KASHINATH SHINDE, J.) (B. P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Prathamesh Shrikrishna Prabhulendolkar
Gram Panchayat Parnali
B. P. Dharmadikari
Sandeep Kashinath Shinde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
