Petition for leave to resubmit caste claim after rejection was dismissed. Court found request unsustainable though review possibility was left open if relatives were validated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
rsk
18-WP-7357-19.doc
1/2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.7357 OF 2019
Vitthal Ganpat Ghawate vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors.
...Petitioner
...Respondents
WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2001 OF 2019 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.7357 OF 2019
Sampat Madhav Jadhav and Anr.
...Applicants/Intervenors
In the matter between
Vitthal Ganpat Ghawate ...Petitioner vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ...Respondents
...Respondents
Mr. Tejesh Dande i/b Tejesh Dande and Associates for the Petitioner. Mr. Sandeep Phatak for the Intervener. Ms. K. N. Solunke, AGP for the Respondent/State.
CORAM : B. P. DHARMADHIKARI & SANDEEP KASHINATH SHINDE, JJ. DATE : 26/08/2019.
P.C.:
. Heard respective counsel. Caste claim of the petitioner was rejected by the Committee and that rejection has attained finality before Hon’ble Apex Court. The petitioner thereafter has learnt that some of his blood relatives have got caste certificate. Because of this, the present petition has been filed seeking leave to resubmit the caste claim. Submission is caste claim was earlier invalidated because the petitioner
rsk
18-WP-7357-19.doc
2/2
could not place on record necessary documents to establish line of descent.
(SANDEEP KASHINATH SHINDE, J.) (B. P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Vitthal Ganpat Ghawate
The State of Maharashtra
Sampat Madhav Jadhav
B. P. DHARMADHIKARI
SANDEEP KASHINATH SHINDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
