This single-paragraph interim order continued a previous stay in a writ petition challenging bank action pending the DRT's decision on a separate stay application. The petition was disposed of without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1)
970-wp-726-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
970 WRIT PETITION NO.726 OF 2019
M/S MAHESH OIL MILL AND DAL MILL THROUGH PROPRIETOR
MAHARUDRA BAPURAO SAKHARE..PETITIONER
VERSUS
THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER CANARA BANK
AND OTHERS
..RESPONDENTS
Mr. Shailendra S. Gangakhedkar, Advocate for the
Petitioner.
Mr. S. B. Nanode, AGP for Respondents-State.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
ANIL S. KILOR, JJ.
DATED : 29th AUGUST, 2019.
PER COURT:-
1.Though respondent no.1 is served, none
appears for respondent no.1. Interim relief is
operating from 17.1.2019.
2.Mr. Gangakhedkar, learned counsel for the
petitioner submits that the D.R.T. has kept the
matter for hearing on 18.10.2019.
3.Interim order passed by this Court is
continued till the D.R.T. decides the stay
application filed by the petitioner on its own
merits.
(2)
970-wp-726-2019
4.With these observations, writ petition is
disposed of. No costs.
(ANIL S. KILOR) (S. V. GANGAPURWALA)
JUDGE JUDGE
Devendra/August-19
M/s Mahesh Oil Mill and Dal Mill Through Proprietor Maharudra Bapurao Sakhare
The Authorized Officer Canara Bank
Others
S. V. Gangapurwala
Anil S. Kilor
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court