Petitioner challenged vehicle seizure. Court held Circle Officer lacked authority to seize. Order directed release of vehicle after verifying ownership, genuineness of documents, and obtaining bond.
Respondents directed to release seized vehicle after verifying ownership, document genuineness, and obtaining bond.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
WP.2261.19
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.2261 OF 2019
Navnath Ramrao Khoje .. Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and ors. .. Respondents
Mr R.V. Gore, Advocate for petitioner Mr V.M. Kagne, A.G.P. for respondents
CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND ANIL S. KILOR, JJ.
DATE : 28.08.2019
ORAL ORDER :
2
WP.2261.19
( ANIL S. KILOR, J.)
( S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.)
vvr
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a Circle Officer has the authority to seize a vehicle for illegal transportation of sand.
Navnath Ramrao Khoje
The State of Maharashtra
Anil S. Kilor
S.V. Gangapurwala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
