Oral order disposing of writ petition on preliminary ground that alternative remedy before C.A.T. is available. Petition dismissed.
Writ petition disposed with liberty to approach Central Administrative Tribunal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.397 OF 2018
Mangesh Kishore Parkar .. Petitioner
Versus
The Union of India and ors.
.. Respondents
Mr S.N. Suryawanshi, Advocate for petitioner Mr D.G. Nagode, Advocate for respondents no.1 to 3
CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND ANIL S. KILOR, JJ.
DATE : 28.08.2019
ORAL ORDER :
( ANIL S. KILOR, J.) ( S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.)
vvr
Mangesh Kishore Parkar
The Union of India
S.V. Gangapurwala
Anil S. Kilor
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
