Petitioner sought writ after reinstatement was granted but he was denied duty access. Court dismissed petition, allowing approach to higher authorities.
Petitioner permitted to approach higher authorities including Commissioner for implementation of reinstatement order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 932.WP6295.19.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.6295/2019
Vilas Dadajii Ramteke
vs.
State of Maharashtra and ors.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders
............................................................................................................................................ Shri. I. G. Meshram, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri. A. M. Deshpande, Additional Government Pleader for respondent No.1.
CORAM : R.K. DESHPANDE & VINAY JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 13th September, 2019
In spite of granting reinstatement by setting aside the termination, the Secretary, Gram Panchayat is not permitting the petitioner to join duty. The petitioner is at liberty to approach the Higher Authority including the Commissioner, to seek implementation of the order.
Hence, the petition is dismissed with a view to approach to alternate Authorities.
All questions are left open.
JUDGE
JUDGE
RGurnule
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to join duty immediately after reinstatement was granted.
Vilas Dadajii Ramteke
State of Maharashtra
R.K. Deshpande
Vinay Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court