Dismissing a public interest litigation regarding an e-tender cancellation, the court held that the petition was no longer necessary as the petitioner stated their grievance was satisfied.
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Order
1109pil52.19
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 52/2019.
Tirath Jugraj Yetre and another.
-VERSUS-
State of Maharashtra and others.
Office notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders
or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Shri A.Y. Kapgate, Advocate for Petitioners.
Shri S.M. Ukey, Addl.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
CORAM : R.K. DESHPANDE & VINAY JOSHI, JJ.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 11, 2019.
Heard.
2.Petitioners have filed a Pursis stating that a
corrigendum has been published in daily Lokmat on
11.09.2019, canceling e-tender notice of 46 works
under Special Works Scheme due to technical reason.
Hence, they do not want to proceed further with this
petition, as their grievance are satisfied.
3.In view of above, Petition is dismissed as
infructuous.
JUDGE JUDGE
Rgd.
Tirath Jugraj Yetre and another
State of Maharashtra and others
R.K. Deshpande
Vinay Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court