Disposed

Shri Dattatraya Sansthan Shikhar Mahur through Secretary Shri. Ganesh Tukaram Patil v. State of Maharashtra, through Chief Secretary, Revenue and Foerest Department, Mumbai and Others

Bombay HC13 Sept 2019WP/6292/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner consented to withdraw the writ petition seeking implementation of a Government Resolution dated 30-07-2010 to save trust property. The petition was permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to adopt other remedies.

What did the court decide?

Petition permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to adopt other remedies available in law.

Shri Dattatraya Sansthan Shikhar Mahur through… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

1 929.WP6292.19.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO.6292/2019

¶4

Shri Dattatraya Sansthan Shikhar Mahur At Shikhar Mandir, Mahur.

¶5

vs.

¶6

State of Maharashtra and ors.

¶7

.............................................................................................................................................. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders

¶8

Shri. S. U. Nemade, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri. A. Madiwale, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent Nos. 1 to 6.

¶9

CORAM : R.K. DESHPANDE & VINAY JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 13^th September, 2019

¶10

Heard.

¶11

The petition seeks implementation of the policy of the Government pertaining to the Government Resolution.

¶12

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition to take appropriate steps to seek implementation of the Government Resolution dated 30-07-2010 and to save the property of the trust.

¶13

The petition is permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to adopt all such other remedies as are available in laws.

¶14

JUDGEJUDGE

¶15

RGurnule

¶16

2 929.WP6292.19.odt

Shri Dattatraya Sansthan Shikhar Mahur through Secretary Shri. Ganesh Tukaram Patil v. State of Maharashtra, through Chief Secretary, Revenue and Foerest Department, Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shri Dattatraya Sansthan Shikhar Mahur through Secretary Shri. Ganesh Tukaram Patil v. State of Maharashtra, through Chief Secretary, Revenue and Foerest Department, Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Swabhimani Setkari Sanghatna, through Its President, Prashant Kashiram Dikkar Vs Union of India, through Principal Secretary, Ministry of Agriculture, Mumbai and 4 Others

Sunita Sudhakar Reddiwar Vs Directorate of Accountant and Treasures, Maharashtra State, Mumbai Thr. Director and Another

Tirath S/O Jagraj Yetre and Another Vs State of Maharashtra Dept. of Urban Dev. Mumbai through Principal Secretary and Others

Vilas S/O Dadaji Ramteke Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary, Rural Development Department, Mumbai and 3 Others

Ku. Prerna Bapurao Bahe Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Mumbai and Other

Panchasheel Vidhyaalankar Shikshan Sanstha, Washim Thr. President Satyanand Bhimrao Kamble and Anr. Vs State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, School Education and Sports Department, Mumbai and Others