The single-judge High Court bench of Nagpur disposed of Writ Petition No. 5564 of 2019 filed by Smt. Parineeta Parmanand Jaiswal as infructuous because her second appeal was already allowed in her favour, extinguishing her grievance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Order
0409wp5564.19
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION NO. 5564/2019.
Smt. Parineeta Parmanand Jaiswal.
-VERSUS-
The Commissioner for State Excise and another.
Office notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders
or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Shri R.D. Bhuibar, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Shri A.M. Deshpande, Add.G.P. for Respondents.
CORAM : R.K. DESHPANDE &
VINAY JOSHI, JJ.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 04, 2019.
Heard.
2.It is informed by the learned counsel for
the petitioner that second appeal filed by her was
heard, and is allowed in her favour. Hence, grievance
of petitioner does not survive.
3.Writ Petition is, therefore, disposed of as
infructuous. No costs.
JUDGE JUDGE
Rgd.
Smt. Parineeta Parmanand Jaiswal
The Commissioner for State Excise
R.K. DESHPANDE
VINAY JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court