The High Court dismissed the contempt petition holding that the petitioner had an alternative remedy by filing a separate petition. The matter was adjudicated without costs being awarded to the petitioner.
Contempt petition dismissed. No costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Order
2808cp228.19
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 228/2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2333/2019.
Ashutosh Kumar Markhande
Vinay Kumar Singh and another.
Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Shri S.P. Bhandarkar, Advocate for the Petitioner.
CORAM : R.K. DESHPANDE & VINAY JOSHI, JJ.
DATE : AUGUST 28, 2019.
Heard.
he has a remedy of filing separate petition challenging said decision. We therefore, do not find any reason to proceed in the matter in contempt. Contempt Petition is accordingly, dismissed. No costs.
JUDGE JUDGE
Rgd.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should entertain a contempt petition when the petitioner has a remedy of filing a separate petition.
Ashutosh Kumar Markhande
Vinay Kumar Singh
R.K. DESHPANDE
VINAY JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
