The petitioner, through counsel, submitted that the impugned order has been complied with. The court found no surviving cause for the petition and dismissed it as infructuous.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
0409wp2060.19.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
Writ Petition No.2060 of 2019 Smt. Sangit Prakash Dange Versus State of Maharashtra, State Excise Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai, through its Secretary and others.
Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order
Shri S.G. Jagtap, Advocate for Petitioner. Shri A.A. Madiwale, Assistant Government Pleader for Respondents.
Coram : R.K. Deshpande & Vinay Joshi, JJ. Date : 4th September, 2019
Shri Jagtap, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, submits that the order has been complied with and hence nothing survives in this petition.
The petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(Vinay Joshi, J.) (R.K. Deshpande, J.)
Lanjewar, PS
Smt. Sangit Prakash Dange
State of Maharashtra
Vinay Joshi
R.K. Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
