Disposed

Mahesh Suresh Patil v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Bombay HC17 Jul 2019WP/5306/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bench directed petitioner to submit a fresh parole application within two weeks with recent medical certificate. Authority to consider within four weeks if received. Writ petition disposed of with directions.

What did the court decide?

Leave granted to apply afresh for parole within two weeks with recent medical certificate and necessary documents; authority directed to consider within four weeks.

Mahesh Suresh Patil Vs the State of… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

5-wp-5306.2018.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶3

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO. 5306 OF 2018

Mahesh Suresh Patil

… Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Ors. … Respondents

¶9

Adv Harjeet Kaur for the petitioner.

¶10

Mr. Arfan Sait, APP for the State.

¶11

Mr. P.S. Shinde, Jailor II, Kolhapur Central Prison, Kolhapur present.

¶12

CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & MRS.SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ. DATE : JULY 17, 2019

¶13

P.C. :

¶14

Heard respective counsel.

¶15

Counsel for the petitioner states that she has recent medical certificate which does not show any improvement in the health of mother. We find that parole was sought on the basis of certificate dated 23/7/2018 wherein Dr. Pethkar has advised surgical operation hysterectomy as early as possible.

¶16

The order passed by the Divisional Commissioner on 05/02/2018 is obviously prior to the certificate mentioned supra

1/2

nilegaonkar

5-wp-5306.2018.odt

and therefore, it is not relevant. The appellate order is dated 09/08/2018 and it refers to the application dated 04/06/2018 moved by the prisoner. This application again is prior to the medical certificate mentioned supra.

¶21

During the arguments, counsel for the petitioner has submitted that for the alleged late reporting offence under section 224 of IPC was registered and he has been acquitted of it. It is also submitted that in other criminal matter to which reference has been made in the order dated 05/02/2018, the competent court has released him on bail. She also submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to furnish proper surety.

¶22

We find that even the certificate which is being relied upon before this court is now one year old. If the petitioner has got any recent certificate, we grant him leave to apply afresh with the said certificate and necessary documents. If such application is received within two weeks from today, the authority shall consider it as per law within next four weeks.

¶23

With these directions, we dispose of the writ petition.

¶24

(MRS.SWAPNA JOSHI, J.) (B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)

¶25

2/2

¶26

nilegaonkar

Mahesh Suresh Patil v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mahesh Suresh Patil v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Parmeshwar S/O. Malleshi Khyadagi @ Parmeshwar S/O. Gurulingappa Lachyan Vs the State of Maharashtra

The State of Maharashtra Vs Rohit@Maale Govind Dingam and Ors.

Irappa @ Sharmal Subhash Dhangar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Vijay @ Vijay Bijya Kale Vs the State of Maharashtra

Anil Ankush Gadekar Vs the State of Maharashtra

Mahadeo Laxman Sarane Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.