This court considered a prayer to condone a 17-day delay in filing a leave to appeal under section 378 IPC. The court found the reasons justified and condensed the delay, directing registration of the petition for admission after four weeks.
Delay of 17 days in preferring leave to appeal under section 378 IPC was condoned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
rsk
17-APPP-268-19.doc
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.268 OF 2019 IN
CRIMINAL APPLICATION TO APPEAL (STATE) STAMP NO.45 OF 2019
The State of Maharashtra
...Appellant
vs.
Rohit @ Maale Govind Dingam and Ors.
...Respondents
Mr. J. P. Yagnik, APP for the State. Ms. Tanaya D. Goswami for Respondent Nos.1 to 4.
CORAM : B. P. DHARMADHIKARI & MRS. SWAPNA S. JOSHI, JJ. DATE : 16/07/2019.
P.C.:
. The State Government has filed proceedings under section 378 of IPC seeking leave to appeal and as there is delay of 17 days in preferring it, prayer is to condone the same. The reasons given are supported by affirmation. Learned counsel for the petitioner is opposing the prayer. However, as we find the reasons justified, we condone delay. Office to register the petition seeking leave and place it for admission after 4 weeks along with Record & Proceedings. Learned counsel waives service of notice for accused persons.
(MRS. SWAPNA S. JOSHI, J.)
(B. P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 17 days in preferring leave to appeal under section 378 IPC should be condoned.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
The State of Maharashtra
Rohit @ Maale Govind Dingam and Ors.
B. P. DHARMADHIKARI
SWAPNA S. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
