In this writ petition challenging the petitioner's tribe claim validity, the Advocate General informed the Court that the claim was invalidated, resulting in the dismissal of the petition without costs.
Writ petition disposed of. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
122.wp.5020.19.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
122 WRIT PETITION NO.5020 OF 2019
DILIP GOVINDA SONAWANE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Kalyan Patil h/f. Mr. Barlinge S. R. AGP for Respondent :Mr. P.S. Patil
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND MANGESH S. PATIL, JJ.
DATE : 29/07/2019
PER COURT :
petitioner is invalidated.
( MANGESH S. PATIL, J. ) ( S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. )
habeeb
1/1
DILIP GOVINDA SONAWANE
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
S. V. GANGAPURWALA
MANGESH S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
