The Single Judge set aside the order rejecting the proposal to transfer the petitioner's school from unaided to aided status, directing the Education Officer to reconsider it within six months considering a connected judgment.
Impugned order set aside; Education Officer directed to reconsider transfer proposal within six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 909-CA8650-19.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8650 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2630 OF 2019
Dipika D/o Vishnu Zunjur
.. Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and Others
.. Respondents
Mr. V. H. Dighe, Advocate for Applicant. Mr. K. N. Lokhande, AGP for Respondnets-State.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & MANGESH S. PATIL, JJ
DATED : 26th JULY, 2019.
PER COURT :-
1 of 2
2 909-CA8650-19.doc
( MANGESH S. PATIL ) ( S. V. GANGAPURWALA ) JUDGE JUDGE
P.S.B.
2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the impugned order rejecting transfer of unaided school to aided status should be set aside for reconsideration.
Dipika D/o Vishnu Zunjur
The State of Maharashtra and Others
S. V. GANGAPURWALA
MANGESH S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
