Allowed

Krushna Gunaji Chavan v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC29 Jul 2019WP/3837/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought a tribe certificate for 'Thakur' scheduled tribe. Despite respondent's objection regarding residence and record details, the court quashed impugned orders directing issuance of the certificate pending formal validation.

What did the court decide?

Impugned orders quashed; Respondent No. 3 directed to issue tribe certificate of 'Thakur' scheduled tribe subject to scrutiny.

Krushna Gunaji Chavan Vs the State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

87.wp.3837.18.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

87 WRIT PETITION NO.3837 OF 2018

¶4

KRUSHNA GUNAJI CHAVAN

¶5

VERSUS

¶6

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶7

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Murkute J.M. AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3: Mr. S.B. Pulkundwar

¶8

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND MANGESH S. PATIL, JJ.

¶9

DATE : 29/07/2019

¶10

PER COURT :

¶11

The application filed by the petitioner for issuance of tribe certificate of 'Thakur' schedule tribe is rejected. Appeal filed against the same is dismissed. Aggrieved thereby the present petition.

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the school record of real paternal aunt of the petitioner records cast as Thakur. The said record is of the year 1972. The school record of the petitioner, his sister record cast as Thakur. The learned counsel submits that the paternal cousins from the branch of petitioner's grandfather's real brother have been issued with the validity certificate of 'Thakur' scheduled tribe. According to the learned counsel there are

¶13

1/3

¶14

87.wp.3837.18.odt

¶15

no contra entries on record. The learned AGP submits that the record produced by the petitioner does not mention cast as Thakur scheduled tribe. Their record is of recent period. The petitioner does not belong to the area where normally the Thakur scheduled tribe persons is used to reside.

¶16

At the time of issuance of tribe certificate, the authority has

¶17

to be prima facie satisfied long drawn inquiry is not contemplated. Even otherwise, the tribe certificate has to undergo the acid test during validation proceeding.

¶18

It appears that the school record of the petitioner, his real sister so also real paternal aunt record cast as Thakur. The school record of petitioner's paternal aunt is of the year 1972. The other paternal branch of the petitioner as per the genealogy supplied by the petitioner demonstrates that two of the paternal cousins namely Keshav Chavan and Kalpana Chavan are issued with the validity certificate of Thakur scheduled tribe. Considering the same, we pass the following order :-

¶19

ORDER

¶20

The impugned orders are quashed and set aside. The respondents No. 3 shall issue tribe certificate to the

¶21

2/3

¶22

87.wp.3837.18.odt

¶23

petitioner of 'Thakur' scheduled tribe which certificate shall have to undergo scrutiny, by the Scrutiny Committee at the time of issuance of validity certificate.

¶24

Writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶25

( MANGESH S. PATIL, J. ) ( S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. )

¶26

habeeb

¶27

3/3

Krushna Gunaji Chavan v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Krushna Gunaji Chavan v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sk.Kasam Vs the State of Mah.

Lahu Uttamrao Tambe and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Dipika Vishnu Zunjur Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Nilesh Sudhakar Koli Vs the Administrative Director Msedcl Office at Prakashgad Dr a K Marg Bandra East Mumbai

Wakchaure Reshma Laxman and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Dilip Govinda Sonawane Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others