High Court in a single-line order kept a defence regarding the petitioner Secretary open for future consideration, granting liberty to raise it at an appropriate juncture before disposing of the writ petition.
Liberty granted to the petitioner to raise his defence at an appropriate juncture.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
33-wp-4625.2019.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 4625 OF 2019
Shri Arun Sadashiv Dhotre
… Petitioner
Versus
State of Maharashtra … Respondent
Mr. U.B. Nighot for the petitioner.
Mr.S.R. Shinde, APP for the State.
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & NITIN R. BORKAR, JJ. DATE : DECEMBER 12, 2019
P.C. :
The defence of the petitioner Secretary cannot be looked into at this stage of investigation. We however, keep it open and with a liberty to the petitioner to raise it at appropriate juncture, dispose of the writ petition.
(NITIN R. BORKAR, J.)
(B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
1/1
nilegaonkar
Shri Arun Sadashiv Dhotre
State of Maharashtra
B.P. DHARMADHIKARI
NITIN R. BORKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
