The High Court dismissed Writ Petition No. 4582 of 2017 for want of prosecution after multiple adjournments due to the absence of petitioner's counsel.
Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution; pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
904-wp-4582.2017.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 4582 OF 2017
Dr. Manek Maharudra Chimegawe & Ors.
… Petitioners
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and Ors.
… Respondents
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 247 OF 2018 AND CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 251 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4582 OF 2017
None for the petitioners.
Mr.Chetan Kapadia a/w Mr. Abhishek Bhandary i/by Nikhil Randive for respondent nos. 6 and 8.
Adv. Manisha Jagtap for respondent nos. 11 and 12.
Adv Shivani Sharma for respondent no. 9.
Smt.Aruna Pai, APP for the State.
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & NITIN R. BORKAR, JJ. DATE : DECEMBER 12, 2019
P.C. :
Nobody for the petitioners even today.
petitioners. Respective other advocates are present for the
1/2
nilegaonkar
904-wp-4582.2017.odt
respondents. On 21/11/2019 we had adjourned the matter to today for dismissal.
(NITIN R. BORKAR, J.)
(B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
2/2
nilegaonkar
Dr. Manek Maharudra Chimegawe & Ors.
The State of Maharashtra and Ors.
B.P. DHARMADHIKARI
NITIN R. BORKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
