The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench dismissed a writ petition filed by residents of village Borgaon seeking an enquiry into the alleged DOB tampering of a retired government employee. The court found the petitioners lacked locus standi to claim such relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Order
1709wp4553.19
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION NO. 4553/2019.
Dattu Damodhar Sawarbandhe and others.
-VERSUS-
State of Maharashtra and others.
Office notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders
or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Shri S.K. Thengre, Advocate for Petitioners.
Ms. N.P.Mehta, A.G.P. for Respondent No.1.
CORAM : R.K. DESHPANDE & VINAY JOSHI, JJ.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 17, 2019.
Heard.
2.The present petition has been filed by
residents of village Borgaon (Ch), Tahsil Paoni, District
Bhandara claiming a relief that enquiry against
respondent no.8 Vithal Atmaram Moharkar be
conducted in respect of date of birth, which he is
alleged to have tampered in the records, and got the
advantage of continuing in service for a period of two
months more. Respondent no.8 has already retired on
04.10.2018.
Order
1709wp4553.19
2
3. We fail to understand the locus of
petitioners to claim such a relief. Writ Petition is,
therefore, dismissed. No costs.
JUDGE JUDGE
Rgd.
Dattu Damodhar Sawarbandhe and others
State of Maharashtra
Vithal Atmaram Moharkar
R.K. Deshpande
Vinay Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court