Writ petition seeking appointment of petitioner as Anganwadi Sevaika was disposed of as she had crossed the upper age limit. The metric of a one-year wait list was also noted.
Writ petition disposed of; no relief granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
80
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
80 WRIT PETITION NO.4162 OF 2019
SUREKHA VITTHALRAO MEGHARE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr Darak B.A.
AGP for Respondents State: Mr P S Patil
Advocate for Respondents 4 and 5 : Mr Umesh S Mote
CORAM: S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
ANIL S. KILOR, JJ.
DATE:16th September, 2019
ORDER :
The petitioner seeks appointment as AnganwadiSevaika in place of respondent No.6. The selection
process is of the year 2010. The Commissioner has
cancelled the appointment of respondent No.6 in the
appeal.
Today, the petitioner has crossed the upper agelimit. Name of the petitioner was in the wait list. Wait
list would be otherwise operative only for one year.
Considering the case from both pedestal, the petitioner
would not be entitled for any relief. In light of that
the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
(ANIL S. KILOR, J.) (S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J.)
JPC
Page 1 of 1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner, who has crossed the upper age limit and was on a one-year wait list, is entitled to appointment as an Anganwadi Sevaika when her selection process is from 2010 and the incumben
Whether the writ petition for appointment of the petitioner as Anganwadi Sevaika deserves consideration.
Surekha Vitthaltro Meghare
The State of Maharashtra
Respondent No. 6
S. V. Gangapurwala
Anil S. Kilor
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court