Writ petitions filed by four individuals against the State of Maharashtra were disposed of as withdrawn by the High Court at Aurangabad with no costs awarded.
Leave to withdraw petitions granted; petitions disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
75
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
75 WRIT PETITION NO.1851 OF 2019
SUNITA SORAKSHANATH SHETE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr Ambetkar Arvind G
AGP for Respondents State: Mr V. M.Kagne
Advocate for Respondents 5 & 6: Mr. S.T. Shelke
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.1852 OF 2019
PRAJAKTA NAVNATH LAGAD
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr Ambetkar Arvind G
AGP for Respondents State: Mr V. M.Kagne
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.1860 OF 2019
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr Ambetkar Arvind G
AGP for Respondents State: Mr V. M.Kagne
Advocate for Respondents 5 & 6: Mr. Avinash D. Aghav
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.1861 OF 2019
SAVITA MEGHRAJ RANDIVE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr Ambetkar Arvind G
AGP for Respondents State: Mr V. M.Kagne
Advocate for Respondents 5 & 6: Mrs Suvarna M Zaware
ORDER :
Learned counsel for the petitioners, on
instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the petitions. Writ
petitions disposed of as withdrawn. No costs.
(ANIL S. KILOR, J.) (S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J.)
JPC
Sunita Sorakshnanath Shete
Prajakta Navnath Lagad
Savita Meghraj Randive
The State of Maharashtra
Anil S. Kilor
S.V. Gangapurwala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court