In a writ petition regarding excavation of soil on specific lands, the High Court held that the petitioner filing to espouse a public cause should have filed a Public Interest Litigation after conducting proper research and obtaining necessary documents. The Court accordingly dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/2
5-wp-2898-19.doc
pdp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2898 OF 2019
Raam Vitthal Dhuri
.. Petitioner
Vs.
The State Environment Department and Ors. .. Respondents
Mr. Vikram N. Walawalkar a/w Sujith Suresh i/by Mr. Amey C. Sawant & Ms. Neha R. Parte for Petitioner. Mr. M. M. Pabale, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. Mr. Ramesh R. Badi for Respondent No.4. Mr. Pandit Kasar for Respondent No.5.
CORAM: PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, CJ. & SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.
OCTOBER 15, 2019.
P.C.
2/2
5-wp-2898-19.doc
SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J. CHIEF JUSTICE
Digitally signed by Pravin Pravin D. Pandit D. Date: Pandit 2019.10.16 10:17:21 +0530
Raam Vitthal Dhuri
The State Environment Department
Pradeep Nandrajog
Bharati Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
