Writ petitioner sought leave to withdraw the petition. The court granted leave and disposed of the writ petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
903.ASWP2876.19.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2876 OF 2019
M/s. Rahul Cables Pvt. Ltd. … Petitioner
Vs
1 Maharashtra State Electricity Transmission Co. Ltd. ... Respondent
Mr. Roshan S. Tanna for the Petitioner.
Mr. Abhijeet A. Joshi for the Respondent No.1.
CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI &
G.S. PATEL, JJ.
THURSDAY, 19TH SEPTEMBER, 2019
P.C. :
1 The learned advocate appearing for the petitioner
seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition. Leave granted. The
writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn and stands disposed of
accordingly.
G.S. PATEL, J. S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.
SRP 1/1
M/s. Rahul Cables Pvt. Ltd.
1 Maharashtra State Electricity Transmission Co. Ltd.
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI
G.S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
