This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
501.CAW2138.19.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2138 OF 2019 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 335 OF 2019
1 Sane Guruji Shikshan Sanstha & Ors. … Applicants
Vs
1 State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents
Mr. S.S. Kanetkar for the Applicants.
Mr. V.M. Mali, AGP, for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4.
Mr. Mahesh Subramaniam i/b S.V. Pitre for the Respondent No.5.
Dr. Ganpat More, Education Off i cer, Zilla Parishad, Pune.
CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & G.S. PATEL, JJ.
THURSDAY, 19TH SEPTEMBER, 2019
P.C. :
1 The papers in this matter were directed to be produced simply because of the apprehension of Mr. Kanetkar that the petitioner-Management is being forced to assign duties to
the f i fth respondent in the face of the interim order passed in this
petition.
SRP 1/2
501.CAW2138.19.doc
2 The order passed by this Court is clear and there was no occasion for the concerned off i cial to have issued any direction or insisted on the Management to assign duties to the f i fth respondent. The communication that was issued on 15 th June, 2019, according to Mr. Mali, learned AGP, was under a misconception and there is no intentional or deliberate act. Hereafter the concerned statutory off i cials will not insist on assigning any duties to the f i fth respondent during the pendency of the writ petition. Having accepted this statement, made on instructions by Mr. Mali, we close the matter and do not issue any notice in contempt nor do we take further steps against the Education Off i cer.
3 Needless to clarify that the petitioner is at liberty to institute any proceedings, civil and/or criminal, in the event any amounts have been deducted from the grants or aid admissible to the petitioner by the f i fth respondent.
4 The Civil Application, accordingly, stands disposed of.
G.S. PATEL, J. S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.
SRP 2/2
1 Sane Guruji Shikshan Sanstha & Ors.
1 State of Maharashtra & Ors.
S.C. Dhar madhikari
G.S. Patel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
